<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ifPeople Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ifpeople.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ifpeople.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:35:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Hashtags: Turning Twitter into a Valuable Tool for Small Businesses by brandon pelissero</title>
		<link>http://ifpeople.wordpress.com/2009/09/28/hashtags-turning-twitter-into-a-valuable-tool-for-small-businesses/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>brandon pelissero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifpeople.wordpress.com/?p=490#comment-319</guid>
		<description>What a great idea. Who knew? The path to twitter keeps getting simpler and simpler. I need to finally break down and tweet. Peer pressure is good pressure when coming from good peers!

Chris and IFPEOPLE rock!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great idea. Who knew? The path to twitter keeps getting simpler and simpler. I need to finally break down and tweet. Peer pressure is good pressure when coming from good peers!</p>
<p>Chris and IFPEOPLE rock!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Evaluating MODx by Evaluating SilverStripe &#171; ifPeople Blog</title>
		<link>http://ifpeople.wordpress.com/2009/09/23/evaluating-modx/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Evaluating SilverStripe &#171; ifPeople Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifpeople.wordpress.com/?p=482#comment-306</guid>
		<description>[...] first impression of SilverStripe was similar to my first impression of MODx: out of the box functionality seems to be very limited.  Again, this is not necessarily a bad [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first impression of SilverStripe was similar to my first impression of MODx: out of the box functionality seems to be very limited.  Again, this is not necessarily a bad [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Evaluating DotNetNuke by Evaluating MODx &#171; ifPeople Blog</title>
		<link>http://ifpeople.wordpress.com/2009/09/22/evaluating-dotnetnuke/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Evaluating MODx &#171; ifPeople Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifpeople.wordpress.com/?p=478#comment-305</guid>
		<description>[...] post evaluating applications that were nominated for Packt Publishing Open Source CMS Awards.  Yesterday, I tried to evaluate DotNetNuke and I was stymied by their web site. I&#8217;ve since received advice from many in the DotNetNuke community, so I will return to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post evaluating applications that were nominated for Packt Publishing Open Source CMS Awards.  Yesterday, I tried to evaluate DotNetNuke and I was stymied by their web site. I&#8217;ve since received advice from many in the DotNetNuke community, so I will return to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Evaluating MODx by jzigbe</title>
		<link>http://ifpeople.wordpress.com/2009/09/23/evaluating-modx/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>jzigbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 05:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifpeople.wordpress.com/?p=482#comment-304</guid>
		<description>If you are good at html and css, MODx is perfect for you. 
It allows a great deal of flexibility. 
You can within hours graft a html/css or wordpress design on to MODx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are good at html and css, MODx is perfect for you.<br />
It allows a great deal of flexibility.<br />
You can within hours graft a html/css or wordpress design on to MODx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Evaluating DotNetNuke by Scott Willhite</title>
		<link>http://ifpeople.wordpress.com/2009/09/22/evaluating-dotnetnuke/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Willhite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifpeople.wordpress.com/?p=478#comment-301</guid>
		<description>FYI.  The browser issue is not with FireFox in general... but very specifically with FireFox 3.5 on Linux, it&#039;s a broswercaps issue actually... I&#039;ll see if I can get one of our engineers to comment further.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI.  The browser issue is not with FireFox in general&#8230; but very specifically with FireFox 3.5 on Linux, it&#8217;s a broswercaps issue actually&#8230; I&#8217;ll see if I can get one of our engineers to comment further.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Evaluating DotNetNuke by Scott Willhite</title>
		<link>http://ifpeople.wordpress.com/2009/09/22/evaluating-dotnetnuke/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Willhite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifpeople.wordpress.com/?p=478#comment-300</guid>
		<description>Murphy&#039;s Law reigns.  The day of your attempt we went through an IP conversion in our infrastructure which resulted in the mail server being (very) temporarily unreachable.  It was resolved within minutes of being identified.  And our downloads page was also updated that day, the Installation instructions are no longer behind a form.  Hope you&#039;ll give us another try!

Scott Willhite
Director of Community Relations</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Murphy&#8217;s Law reigns.  The day of your attempt we went through an IP conversion in our infrastructure which resulted in the mail server being (very) temporarily unreachable.  It was resolved within minutes of being identified.  And our downloads page was also updated that day, the Installation instructions are no longer behind a form.  Hope you&#8217;ll give us another try!</p>
<p>Scott Willhite<br />
Director of Community Relations</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Evaluating MODx by Valerie</title>
		<link>http://ifpeople.wordpress.com/2009/09/23/evaluating-modx/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Valerie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifpeople.wordpress.com/?p=482#comment-299</guid>
		<description>I, too, had my first experience with MODx yesterday. I was asked by a client to make some changes to a site whose original designer is now long gone. While I stumbled through the interface for awhile, I did finally figure out how to make the changes they wanted. The mention of chunks and snippets is a bit intimidating, however.

Since my services are more on managing the content vs creating sites, now I have to decide whether or not they should keep their site and find someone who can create new templates and add more functionality to their site with MODx, or just recommend they do a complete re-write.

That said, your post was very helpful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too, had my first experience with MODx yesterday. I was asked by a client to make some changes to a site whose original designer is now long gone. While I stumbled through the interface for awhile, I did finally figure out how to make the changes they wanted. The mention of chunks and snippets is a bit intimidating, however.</p>
<p>Since my services are more on managing the content vs creating sites, now I have to decide whether or not they should keep their site and find someone who can create new templates and add more functionality to their site with MODx, or just recommend they do a complete re-write.</p>
<p>That said, your post was very helpful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Evaluating DotNetNuke by Tom</title>
		<link>http://ifpeople.wordpress.com/2009/09/22/evaluating-dotnetnuke/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifpeople.wordpress.com/?p=478#comment-298</guid>
		<description>Josh,

I think you gave up to easily.  The site renders fine in Firefox 3.5.3 for me.

The software can be downloaded from Codeplex.com directly, see http://dotnetnuke.codeplex.com/

Prerequisites are:  MS SQL database (2005 preferred, but 2000 will work for now. It does work with the free version, SQL Express) and MS IIS 6 or 7, with the .NET Framework 2.0

Give it another look, I thing you&#039;ll be surprised.  The user and role managment and permissions are much easier to use compared to Drupal.

TPM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh,</p>
<p>I think you gave up to easily.  The site renders fine in Firefox 3.5.3 for me.</p>
<p>The software can be downloaded from Codeplex.com directly, see <a href="http://dotnetnuke.codeplex.com/" rel="nofollow">http://dotnetnuke.codeplex.com/</a></p>
<p>Prerequisites are:  MS SQL database (2005 preferred, but 2000 will work for now. It does work with the free version, SQL Express) and MS IIS 6 or 7, with the .NET Framework 2.0</p>
<p>Give it another look, I thing you&#8217;ll be surprised.  The user and role managment and permissions are much easier to use compared to Drupal.</p>
<p>TPM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Evaluating DotNetNuke by Rob Chartier</title>
		<link>http://ifpeople.wordpress.com/2009/09/22/evaluating-dotnetnuke/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Chartier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifpeople.wordpress.com/?p=478#comment-297</guid>
		<description>I agree with the fact that DNN&#039;s public site should be much more stable, defintely something they should pay more attention to.

Interesting enough, I checked the public site with FF3.5 and couldnt repro. the issue.  Where you just hitting the main page itself?

I wonder if you stumbled on it at a bad time, during a maintenance window.

Good luck with your reviews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the fact that DNN&#8217;s public site should be much more stable, defintely something they should pay more attention to.</p>
<p>Interesting enough, I checked the public site with FF3.5 and couldnt repro. the issue.  Where you just hitting the main page itself?</p>
<p>I wonder if you stumbled on it at a bad time, during a maintenance window.</p>
<p>Good luck with your reviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Evaluating DotNetNuke by Josh</title>
		<link>http://ifpeople.wordpress.com/2009/09/22/evaluating-dotnetnuke/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifpeople.wordpress.com/?p=478#comment-296</guid>
		<description>The answer to why I didn&#039;t just download the site from Codeplex is that I didn&#039;t know how to do that.  I was approaching DotNetNuke as a total newbie, interested in trying it out.  My experience with the website was extremely off-putting, in just about every regard.  This is not welcoming for newbies.

When you adopt an open source product, you are also becoming part of community.  There shouldn&#039;t be crazy barriers to entry like a broken website.  And the website was broken.  The FF3.5 problems were not my only concern.  As I noted, the SMTP server was also not configured properly.

That said, I am still interested in checking out the software, so I will try to download it from Codeplex.  Right now, though, it has been moved to the bottom of my list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer to why I didn&#8217;t just download the site from Codeplex is that I didn&#8217;t know how to do that.  I was approaching DotNetNuke as a total newbie, interested in trying it out.  My experience with the website was extremely off-putting, in just about every regard.  This is not welcoming for newbies.</p>
<p>When you adopt an open source product, you are also becoming part of community.  There shouldn&#8217;t be crazy barriers to entry like a broken website.  And the website was broken.  The FF3.5 problems were not my only concern.  As I noted, the SMTP server was also not configured properly.</p>
<p>That said, I am still interested in checking out the software, so I will try to download it from Codeplex.  Right now, though, it has been moved to the bottom of my list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
